The Botswana Beef Industry

2.93 w

The History of Botswana Cattle Breeding

Cattle breeding in Botswana though not a new practice took a stronghold in the early 20th century when a more rationalised breeding programme was put into effect throughout the country. Before this period, some cattle breeds like the Africaner, Friesian and Sussex were brought into the country by European settlers and a large herd of Africaner cattle was also brought in the late 19th century by the BakgatJa tribe. In the early 1930s, several Livestock Improvement Centres (UC) were set up in tribal reserves to produce crossbred bulls and heifers for sale to the local farmers to improve their stock.
These centres were in the Bakgatla, Balete, Barolong, Bangwato, Bangwaketse and Bakwena reserves. The choice of breeds and the breeding programmes to be followed were left entirely to individual committees of the centres, hence different breeds were introduced in the centres for crossbreeding with the Tswana cattle.
Although all the centres had the Africaner breed, some other breeds like the Sussex in the Bangwaketse, Dairy Shorthorn and Dual-Purpose Shorthorn in the Balong and Friesian in the Bangwato centres were also used. However, some of the breeds like the Sussex were later abandoned because they did not perform as well as they were expected to. In 1944, the authorities in the country then decided that the Africaner was to be the main and majority breed produced by all the centres in the country. The decision came about because of the good performance of the Africaner herd which was in the Bakgatla reserve at that time.

2.94 wZebu crossbreed

Three other breeds, the Zimbabwean Tuli, the Brahman and the Simmental were later introduced and used for crossbreeding purposes. The Government encouraged the use of these breeds through the Bull Subsidy Scheme which sells bulls to farmers at highly subsidised prices and artificial insemination services. At the time, the production levels of these breeds and their crossbreds were not known because no performance records were kept.

The Holistic View of the Botswana Beef Industry

2.95 wBotswana

The people of Botswana and the cattle population have been inextricably linked for hundreds of years and cattle, whether they are bred for milk or beef, form part of the fabric of everyday life for the Batswana people of this Southern Africa landlocked country. Botswana ‘s environment rages from fertile floodplain deltas to areas of fragile ecosystems with fluctuating rainfall, which ensures hardy, nutritious grassland interspersed with low bush referred to as the veld–the home of Botswana’s cattle breeding herd.
The raising of cattle touches almost all the population, with cattle outnumbering people by two to one. Urban dwellers and rural communities alike have some involvement and contact daily with cattle grazing on the veld.

As the Figure (right) illustrates, there is a substantial gap in performance between traditional farmers and commercial farms, with this shortfall being wider still in the case of the best, professionally managed ranches. Offtake rates of commercial farms, a key determinant of profitability, are almost twice those in the traditional segment, whilst death rates fall to a third. An anomaly in this comparison is the higher birth rate in the traditional sector, which could be a result of factors such as breed dynamics. In the production system, such as those from oxen to weaners and from traditional to holistic management could Increase herd sizes, the proportion of adult cows and therefore calving rates, and reduced mortality. Botswana could double its beef production based on roughly the same number of livestock units and therefore land area. Nevertheless, moving to more intensive weaner‐based methods, especially given the increased demand for high-cost imported feed would imply. The wider trend in developed markets away from feedlot-produced beef also needs to be considered.
The comparison in performance is starker when considering other beef exporters. For example, the FAO report highlights that Botswana’s overall off‐take rate of 12% compared unfavourably with those of Namibia (20%), Brazil (18%) and Australia (24%). Market off-take rate is low in the communal cattle production system of Africa, with off-take rates of between 5 and 10%, compared to 25% in the commercial sector. The gross commercial off-take rate is obtained by dividing the total sales of live animals over one year period by the annual average stock. The average stock is obtained by taking the sum of opening and ending balances and dividing it by two. The gross commercial off-take rate does not consider the purchases made by livestock. Although restrictions, such as those on hormone use, limit offtakes in Namibia, it is reported that some commercial farms in that country reach offtake rates of around 20%.

2.96 wTraditional and commercial farm cattle in Botswana (2017)

Breeds and Genetics have been updated and selected, selected to produce beef that has unique flavour and textures and a delicious taste based on natural grassland production systems. Cattle production sits alongside and in some cases amidst diverse wildlife populations, which encompasses Africa‘s largest to its smallest species.
Botswana is a leader in cattle identification and traceability with cattle-implanted rumen boluses. The Rumen Bolus is a sensor that is orally administered by a farmer or a veterinarian, using a standard bolus gun. Once inserted, the bolus will remain in the rumen (specifically the reticulum). Each bolus has a unique ID that can be associated with the animal. The material bolus is an acid-proof resin which protects the electronic parts and causes no harm inside the animal. The bolus is equipped with a battery that has a 6+ years life span. The Smart Rumen Bolus is designed to capture animal activity, rumen temperature and movement. The bolus can be applied to animals of 350+ kgs. Once inserted into the animal, the bolus communicates with a Gateway, over a wide geographical area. The Gateway is a plug & play solution that is normally installed at a cattle barn. which unique electronic radio frequency devices are scanned to provide animal history back to the National Data Base. This ensures consumer confidence based on world’s-based practice. From the unique number of each carton, we can trace the meat back to the specific farm. BMC products are Halaal as supervised and certified by the Botswana Muslim Association.

The Botswana cattle industry uses free-range and natural farming methods, which ensure full–flavoured, lean beef of the highest quality. Botswana ‘s land and its sub-tropical and semi-arid climate are ideally suited for cattle farming. The country boasts between 2.5 – 2.8 million head of cattle.
Droughts brought on by climate change were the cause of the decline in cattle populations, and it was warned that, unless immediate action is taken, the declining cattle numbers could harm Botswana’s economic development. Between 2010 and 2019, the population of cattle in Botswana drastically decreased. Numerous factors have been identified as contributing to the downward trend in the numbers, including poor farm management, low birth rates, high mortality rates, and cattle theft. The Statistics Botswana annual agricultural surveys, which focus primarily on the traditional local economy, show that the cattle population in Botswana is still declining. According to reports, there were 2.55 million cattle in the nation in 2011. This was a slight decrease from the 2.63 million cattle that were counted in 2010.
In the following survey, the numbers went down again, this time from over 1,36 million in 2015 to around 1.15 million in 2017. The major cause of the decline in this period was in part due to the 2015/16 drought, which was declared the worst in three decades. It is not just the cattle population which has declined drastically in Botswana, farmers have left the cattle sub-sector in droves. There were close to 80 000 cattle holdings in 2010, that number dwindled to just under 30 000 as per the 2019 agricultural survey, a more than 62% decline.

smart rumen bolus wRumen bolus sensor

Model of performance potential in cattle production.

 

Oxen and Weaner

Expanded Weaner System

 Herd size

2 700 000

3 000 000

 Mature livestock units

1 944 000

1 980 000

 Breeding cows (%)

40

45

 No. of breeding cows

1 080 000

1 350 000

 Calving rate (%)

55

65

 Calves born

594 000

877 500

 Mortality (%)

9

6

 Net herd increase

297 500

644 850

 No-growth off-take (%)

11

21

 Potential beef production

45 821 160

99 306 900

The decline in cattle population to the effects of Climate Change induced droughts and said that unless drastic action is taken, the plummeting cattle numbers could be detrimental to Botswana’s economic growth.

 

2.98 wCattle production

 

An overview of the Agricultural Sector, Policies, Programmes, and Priorities

2.99 wLivestock sector

The Agricultural sector in Botswana covers both crop and livestock production. Traditional farming is the most dominant in terms of several people involved and the geographical coverage. Most farmers are small-scale farmers who typically need continued assistance in capacity building to commercialize agriculture.
The beef industry is the only sub-sector of the agriculture sector that has constantly remained a significant contributor to the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The agriculture sector has experienced a steady decline in its contribution to GDP over the past 50 years. The poor performance of the, therefore, represents an added challenge to the fight against poverty. From a 42.7% share in GDP at independence in 1966, agriculture has fallen to 1.9% in 2008 (Ministry of Finance and Development Planning, (2010). According to NDP 10, only 45% of farmers have access to roads, 17% electricity, 22% telecommunication, 64% water for livestock, 66% water for domestic use, 43% water for irrigation, 39% grain storage, 52% markets and 54% sanitation (Ministry of Finance and Development Planning, 2010). This has resulted in slow agro-industrial and supply chain development that is needed to drive the growth of associated sub-sectors such as food processing, transport, and manufacturing. In real terms, the livestock value has been declining over the years. The livestock sector has fared much better over the years, compared to the crop sector.

Botswana is a net importer of dairy products from neighbouring countries; the government engaged consultants under NAMPAADD to come up with recommendations to enable Botswana to produce food for food security. This, therefore, means Botswana should make efforts to foster dairy development plans wherever the potential exists. This would considerably reduce the gap between the production and consumption of dairy products in the country.
The main challenge is the weak linkages with markets. An extension service in its current state is concentrating on production and less on consumption. The Botswana Meat Commission (BMC) fails to meet its quota in the export market. Where it has, the prime markets have been inaccessible because of the sporadic supply and the differences in the size of animals being slaughtered. However, based on the value-chain concept, meat production in Botswana still has the potential to grow substantially even within the current resource levels of rangeland, water, and energy. The transformation needed is about market-led production where farmers understand that “someone is waiting in a restaurant for a specific cut from part of their cow’s carcass,” and that a calf should be weaned for another to be born to complete the production cycle. This system applies to small stocks too. Inputs to production and access to markets are also essential and have largely been addressed except for the negating factors of scattered distribution of production centres (farms). Other value-chain opportunities for optimizing efficiencies within the livestock sub-sector include local utilization of skins, hides, tallows, and other products from abattoirs.

Meat Research and Development in Botswana

The distribution of cattle in terms of commercial vs traditional Production Systems, regions, and cattle ownership. About 84% of the national herd is kept in communal areas which comprise 71% of the country’s land area, while 16% of cattle in the commercial sector is kept on 5% of Botswana’s land area. Of the six regions, the central region, which is the largest, had the highest cattle population (32.5%) in 1986. The vegetation of this region is classified as the hard and sweet veld area with Panicum maximum, Eragrostis Redditor and Didtaria species being the dominant grass species. Though the vegetation and land area for the Southern, Gaborone, Francistown and Maun regions differ, similar cattle numbers were obtained in these areas. The smallest cattle population was in the Western region, which is classified as the sandveld area receiving the lowest seasonal rainfall, hence the lowest carrying capacity even in normal rainfall years. However, farmers in this area are dependent on livestock since crops cannot be grown.
Among cattle farms in the traditional sector, 70.5% own less than 30 cattle comprising 26% of cattle in the traditional sector. In the Commercial sector, 66% of farms own less than 500 cattle constituting 15.9% of cattle in this sector.

Cattle production in Botswana is based on the use of extensive rangeland. There are three major production systems:

  1. Tribal Grazing Land Policy (TGLP), which is a fenced range system.
  2. The traditional “cattle post” system is where cattle are grazed on unfenced communal areas.
  3. The commercial freehold system.

Cattle in the traditional sector depend on natural pastures for feed during both the wet and dry seasons. Supplementary feeding using locally available feed resources is not a common practice among traditional farmers, unlike commercial livestock producers. Crop residues available after grain harvest are grazed in situ rather than harvested as feed for livestock during the dry season when natural pastures deteriorate in both quantity and quality.

Tomorrow’s Botswana Beef Industry

2.100 wTomorrow’s Botswana beef industry

 

There is tremendous potential in the livestock sector in Botswana and Namibia. Tapping into it hinges on transformative actions that boost its competitiveness and sustainability. It needs to promote a sound business environment and increase the productivity of the value chain, without compromising the quality and safety of products. An already daunting challenge in itself, this needs to be done while protecting natural resources, improving social and economic conditions of smallholder producers—by far the largest share in Botswana and Namibia—and safeguarding animal health and welfare.
Botswana and Namibia have come a long way in developing competitive livestock value chains. Their industries are well-organized, meet quality and sanitary requirements of high-end markets, and have good animal identification and traceability systems in place.

Since then, the use of nuclear and nuclear-derived techniques, introduced with support from the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), has enabled the country to put in place veterinary and food safety surveillance systems that meet EU requirements and have successfully passed inspections.

 
2.101 w

2101.2 w

 

Example of competitive livestock value chains

However, productivity has stagnated in the past years due to repeated climate shocks, animal disease outbreaks, and weakened health systems. The business environment remains constrained with limited private capital flows to much-needed critical segments of the value chain, due to a prevailing high degree of direct government involvement and state-owned institutional architecture. The participation of smallholder farmers remains limited. Outdated policy and regulatory frameworks continue to create inefficiencies along the value chain segments, especially for input supply, quality of logistics, labour, and support infrastructure.
Both countries have shown increasing commitment to building up resilience in the sector in the face of climate change. However, there is still much to be done to prepare for future shocks and reduce vulnerability. They need to support community-driven programs on integrated crop-livestock systems, and rangeland management plans and strengthen knowledge and capacity. Both countries need to systematically adopt climate-integrated approaches for the planning and implementation of livestock support programs. To promote the adoption of climate-smart livestock practices, inefficiencies hindering investment need to be removed and entrepreneurial skills necessary to implement innovative technologies and practices fostered.
Achieving the social sustainability of the livestock sector in Botswana and Namibia is a challenge with no easy solution in sight.
Large-scale producers have the integration and necessary access to finance to implement innovative solutions towards sustainability, and they tend to be in areas with a sanitary status that enables export-oriented business. Small-scale farmers, on the other hand, not only would require strong governmental support to adopt sustainable livestock practices, but because of their location, they have a limited scope of target markets, mostly in the low-value spectrum.

The socioeconomic potential of the livestock sector in Botswana and Namibia is immense. However, it will not be achieved without climate-smart livestock practices and bold action towards increased and sustainable social inclusion. Only by interlacing the environmental and equity dimensions of sustainability into the livestock sector, it will become a true driver of sustainable development, a contributor to food security, and the source of improved and resilient livelihoods.
It points to the adaptation of existing practices in resource management and animal husbandry as a highly promising direction in which to achieve scalable impacts, with a regional lens towards integration that will increase competitiveness. As the livestock sectors in both Botswana and Namibia are under serious threat from climate change, both governments have amplified their efforts, introducing strategies to mitigate and adapt, while reducing vulnerability to future shocks.
Botswana and Namibia are two of the world’s most drought-prone countries. In 2018 – 2019, severe drought swept through Namibia killing some 60 000 heads of livestock and causing two-thirds of crops to fail, leaving a third of Namibians without adequate food. In this alarming setting, the agriculture sector is left acutely exposed to climate-related risk, with livestock as its most critically affected subsector. Even setting aside extreme events, some 40% of livestock in Botswana and 43%in Namibia are directly affected by climate change in general.
Roadmap for Sustainable Livestock Value Chains in Southern Africa, the roadmap provides a framework for action to strengthen the cattle and beef value chains in Botswana and Namibia. A compendium of country notes, consolidated notes, and just-in-time outputs was prepared that informed the final output in the form of a roadmap for sustainable livestock value chains in Southern Africa. The roadmap is divided into three sections: sector outlook, current competitiveness and market opportunities, and priority actions. Section one presents the sector outlook and provides a brief description of the global, African, and Southern African state of the livestock sector. Section two presents current competitiveness and emerging market opportunities for potential expanded market share within country-specific and regional value chains. Section three presents priority actions to inform decision processes within Botswana and Namibia as well as areas where joint action could enhance the market share and competitiveness of both countries on continental and international scales.

2.102 wEnhancing the market share and competitiveness between Namibia and Botswana through joint action